Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] ice: access @pp through netmem_desc instead of page

2026-01-08 Thread Alexander Lobakin
From: Pavel Begunkov 
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 13:11:28 +

> On 12/16/25 04:20, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 01:07:23PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
>>> @@ -1251,7 +1251,7 @@ static int ice_lbtest_receive_frames(struct
>>> ice_rx_ring *rx_ring)
>>>   rx_buf = &rx_ring->rx_fqes[i];
>>>   page = __netmem_to_page(rx_buf->netmem);
>>>   received_buf = page_address(page) + rx_buf->offset +
>>> -   page->pp->p.offset;
>>> +   pp_page_to_nmdesc(page)->pp->p.offset;
>>
>> Shouldn't we rather use:
>>
>>     nmdesc = __netmem_to_nmdesc(rx_buf->netmem);
>>     received_buf = nmdesc_address(nmdesc) + rx_buf->offset +
>>     nmdesc->pp->p_offset;
>>
>> (also. i think we're missing a nmdesc_address() function in our API).
> 
> It wouldn't make sense as net_iov backed nmdescs don't have/expose
> host addresses (only dma addresses). nmdesc_address() would still
> need to rely on the caller knowing that it's a page. An explicit
> cast with *netmem_to_page() should be better.

Sorry for the late reply. Holidays... Happy New Year everyone.

I agree with Pavel. This loopback test always operates with
kernel/page-backed memory. I believe it's fully valid to explicitly cast
to a page in such cases and work with it. This is also more clear to the
readers after all (IIRC I suggested this piece of code when Michał was
working on the ice conversion).

Thanks,
Olek


Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] ice: access @pp through netmem_desc instead of page

2025-12-17 Thread Byungchul Park
On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 02:34:14PM +, Loktionov, Aleksandr wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Pavel Begunkov 
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2025 2:16 PM
> > To: Loktionov, Aleksandr ; Byungchul
> > Park ; [email protected]; [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; Nguyen, Anthony L
> > ; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
> > ; [email protected];
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; intel-
> > [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] ice: access @pp
> > through netmem_desc instead of page
> >
> > On 12/17/25 11:46, Loktionov, Aleksandr wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> -Original Message-
> > >> From: Intel-wired-lan  On
> > Behalf
> > >> Of Byungchul Park
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2025 5:07 AM
> > >> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> > >> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> > >> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> > >> Nguyen, Anthony L ; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
> > >> ; [email protected];
> > >> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; intel-
> > >> [email protected]
> > >> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] ice: access @pp through
> > >> netmem_desc instead of page
> > >>
> > >> To eliminate the use of struct page in page pool, the page pool
> > users
> > >> should use netmem descriptor and APIs instead.
> > >>
> > >> Make ice driver access @pp through netmem_desc instead of page.
> > >>
> > > Please add test info: HW/ASIC + PF/VF/SR-IOV, kernel version/branch,
> > exact repro steps, before/after results (expected vs. observed).
> > >
> > >> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park 
> > >> ---
> > >>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c | 2 +-
> > >>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> > >> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> > >> index 969d4f8f9c02..ae8a4e35cb10 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> > >> @@ -1251,7 +1251,7 @@ static int ice_lbtest_receive_frames(struct
> > >> ice_rx_ring *rx_ring)
> > >>rx_buf = &rx_ring->rx_fqes[i];
> > >>page = __netmem_to_page(rx_buf->netmem);
> > >>received_buf = page_address(page) + rx_buf->offset +
> > >> - page->pp->p.offset;
> > >> + pp_page_to_nmdesc(page)->pp->p.offset;
> > > If rx_buf->netmem is not backed by a page pool (e.g., fallback
> > allocation), pp will be NULL and this dereferences NULL.
> > > I think the loopback test runs in a controlled environment, but the
> > code must verify pp is valid before dereferencing.
> > > Isn't it?
> >
> > Considering "page->pp->p.offset" poking into the pool, if that can
> > happen it's a pre-existing problem, which should be fixed first.
> >
> > --
> > Pavel Begunkov
> 
> 
> Good day, Hi Byungchul, Pavel,

Hi,

> Thanks for pushing the driver toward netmem — I fully support removing direct 
> struct page accesses from the networking stack.
> 
> Regarding this change in ice_lbtest_receive_frames():
> 
> received_buf = page_address(page) + rx_buf->offset +
> pp_page_to_nmdesc(page)->pp->p.offset;
> 
> Pavel, you're right that if page->pp could be NULL, it's a pre-existing bug 
> that should be fixed.
> However, looking at the loopback test path, I'm concerned this code doesn't 
> handle non-page-pool allocations safely.
> 
> The netmem model explicitly allows for buffers that aren't page-pool backed.
> While the loopback test likely runs in a controlled environment, the code 
> should verify pp is valid before dereferencing,
> or use the netmem helpers that handle this gracefully:

If it's true, yeah, it definitely should be fixed but in a separate
patch since it's a different issue.  Let's try with a fo

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] ice: access @pp through netmem_desc instead of page

2025-12-17 Thread Loktionov, Aleksandr


> -Original Message-
> From: Pavel Begunkov 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2025 2:16 PM
> To: Loktionov, Aleksandr ; Byungchul
> Park ; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; Nguyen, Anthony L
> ; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
> ; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; intel-
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] ice: access @pp
> through netmem_desc instead of page
> 
> On 12/17/25 11:46, Loktionov, Aleksandr wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Intel-wired-lan  On
> Behalf
> >> Of Byungchul Park
> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2025 5:07 AM
> >> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> >> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> >> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> >> Nguyen, Anthony L ; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
> >> ; [email protected];
> >> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; intel-
> >> [email protected]
> >> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] ice: access @pp through
> >> netmem_desc instead of page
> >>
> >> To eliminate the use of struct page in page pool, the page pool
> users
> >> should use netmem descriptor and APIs instead.
> >>
> >> Make ice driver access @pp through netmem_desc instead of page.
> >>
> > Please add test info: HW/ASIC + PF/VF/SR-IOV, kernel version/branch,
> exact repro steps, before/after results (expected vs. observed).
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park 
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c | 2 +-
> >>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> >> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> >> index 969d4f8f9c02..ae8a4e35cb10 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> >> @@ -1251,7 +1251,7 @@ static int ice_lbtest_receive_frames(struct
> >> ice_rx_ring *rx_ring)
> >>rx_buf = &rx_ring->rx_fqes[i];
> >>page = __netmem_to_page(rx_buf->netmem);
> >>received_buf = page_address(page) + rx_buf->offset +
> >> - page->pp->p.offset;
> >> + pp_page_to_nmdesc(page)->pp->p.offset;
> > If rx_buf->netmem is not backed by a page pool (e.g., fallback
> allocation), pp will be NULL and this dereferences NULL.
> > I think the loopback test runs in a controlled environment, but the
> code must verify pp is valid before dereferencing.
> > Isn't it?
> 
> Considering "page->pp->p.offset" poking into the pool, if that can
> happen it's a pre-existing problem, which should be fixed first.
> 
> --
> Pavel Begunkov


Good day, Hi Byungchul, Pavel,

Thanks for pushing the driver toward netmem — I fully support removing direct 
struct page accesses from the networking stack.

Regarding this change in ice_lbtest_receive_frames():

received_buf = page_address(page) + rx_buf->offset +
pp_page_to_nmdesc(page)->pp->p.offset;

Pavel, you're right that if page->pp could be NULL, it's a pre-existing bug 
that should be fixed.
However, looking at the loopback test path, I'm concerned this code doesn't 
handle non-page-pool allocations safely.

The netmem model explicitly allows for buffers that aren't page-pool backed.
While the loopback test likely runs in a controlled environment, the code 
should verify pp is valid before dereferencing,
or use the netmem helpers that handle this gracefully:

struct netmem_desc *ndesc = __netmem_to_nmdesc(rx_buf->netmem);
void *addr = netmem_address(rx_buf->netmem);
struct page_pool *pp;

if (!addr)
continue; /* unreadable netmem */

pp = __netmem_get_pp(ndesc);
received_buf = addr + rx_buf->offset + (pp ? pp->p.offset : 0);

Alternatively, guard the existing code with page_pool_page_is_pp(page) before 
calling pp_page_to_nmdesc().

This would complete the netmem conversion while fixing the unsafe dereference,
aligning with Matthew's earlier suggestion to use descriptor/address accessors.

Also, please add test details to the commit message:

HW/ASIC (e.g., E810/E823)
PF vs VF, SR-IOV configuration
Kernel tree/commit (net-next @ )
Repro steps: ethtool -t $dev offline
Before/after behavior
Happy to review v2 with these changes.

Best regards,
Alex


Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] ice: access @pp through netmem_desc instead of page

2025-12-17 Thread Pavel Begunkov

On 12/17/25 11:46, Loktionov, Aleksandr wrote:




-Original Message-
From: Intel-wired-lan  On Behalf
Of Byungchul Park
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2025 5:07 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
Nguyen, Anthony L ; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; intel-
[email protected]
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] ice: access @pp through
netmem_desc instead of page

To eliminate the use of struct page in page pool, the page pool users
should use netmem descriptor and APIs instead.

Make ice driver access @pp through netmem_desc instead of page.


Please add test info: HW/ASIC + PF/VF/SR-IOV, kernel version/branch, exact 
repro steps, before/after results (expected vs. observed).


Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park 
---
  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
index 969d4f8f9c02..ae8a4e35cb10 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
@@ -1251,7 +1251,7 @@ static int ice_lbtest_receive_frames(struct
ice_rx_ring *rx_ring)
rx_buf = &rx_ring->rx_fqes[i];
page = __netmem_to_page(rx_buf->netmem);
received_buf = page_address(page) + rx_buf->offset +
-  page->pp->p.offset;
+  pp_page_to_nmdesc(page)->pp->p.offset;

If rx_buf->netmem is not backed by a page pool (e.g., fallback allocation), pp 
will be NULL and this dereferences NULL.
I think the loopback test runs in a controlled environment, but the code must 
verify pp is valid before dereferencing.
Isn't it?


Considering "page->pp->p.offset" poking into the pool, if that can
happen it's a pre-existing problem, which should be fixed first.

--
Pavel Begunkov



Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] ice: access @pp through netmem_desc instead of page

2025-12-17 Thread Pavel Begunkov

On 12/16/25 04:20, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 01:07:23PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:

+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
@@ -1251,7 +1251,7 @@ static int ice_lbtest_receive_frames(struct ice_rx_ring 
*rx_ring)
rx_buf = &rx_ring->rx_fqes[i];
page = __netmem_to_page(rx_buf->netmem);
received_buf = page_address(page) + rx_buf->offset +
-  page->pp->p.offset;
+  pp_page_to_nmdesc(page)->pp->p.offset;


Shouldn't we rather use:

nmdesc = __netmem_to_nmdesc(rx_buf->netmem);
received_buf = nmdesc_address(nmdesc) + rx_buf->offset +
nmdesc->pp->p_offset;

(also. i think we're missing a nmdesc_address() function in our API).


It wouldn't make sense as net_iov backed nmdescs don't have/expose
host addresses (only dma addresses). nmdesc_address() would still
need to rely on the caller knowing that it's a page. An explicit
cast with *netmem_to_page() should be better.

--
Pavel Begunkov



Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] ice: access @pp through netmem_desc instead of page

2025-12-17 Thread Loktionov, Aleksandr



> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-wired-lan  On Behalf
> Of Byungchul Park
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2025 5:07 AM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> Nguyen, Anthony L ; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
> ; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; intel-
> [email protected]
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] ice: access @pp through
> netmem_desc instead of page
> 
> To eliminate the use of struct page in page pool, the page pool users
> should use netmem descriptor and APIs instead.
> 
> Make ice driver access @pp through netmem_desc instead of page.
> 
Please add test info: HW/ASIC + PF/VF/SR-IOV, kernel version/branch, exact 
repro steps, before/after results (expected vs. observed).

> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park 
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> index 969d4f8f9c02..ae8a4e35cb10 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> @@ -1251,7 +1251,7 @@ static int ice_lbtest_receive_frames(struct
> ice_rx_ring *rx_ring)
>   rx_buf = &rx_ring->rx_fqes[i];
>   page = __netmem_to_page(rx_buf->netmem);
>   received_buf = page_address(page) + rx_buf->offset +
> -page->pp->p.offset;
> +pp_page_to_nmdesc(page)->pp->p.offset;
If rx_buf->netmem is not backed by a page pool (e.g., fallback allocation), pp 
will be NULL and this dereferences NULL.
I think the loopback test runs in a controlled environment, but the code must 
verify pp is valid before dereferencing.
Isn't it?

> 
>   if (ice_lbtest_check_frame(received_buf))
>   valid_frames++;
> --
> 2.17.1



Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] ice: access @pp through netmem_desc instead of page

2025-12-15 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 01:07:23PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> @@ -1251,7 +1251,7 @@ static int ice_lbtest_receive_frames(struct ice_rx_ring 
> *rx_ring)
>   rx_buf = &rx_ring->rx_fqes[i];
>   page = __netmem_to_page(rx_buf->netmem);
>   received_buf = page_address(page) + rx_buf->offset +
> -page->pp->p.offset;
> +pp_page_to_nmdesc(page)->pp->p.offset;

Shouldn't we rather use:

nmdesc = __netmem_to_nmdesc(rx_buf->netmem);
received_buf = nmdesc_address(nmdesc) + rx_buf->offset +
nmdesc->pp->p_offset;

(also. i think we're missing a nmdesc_address() function in our API).