On Mar 15, 2004, at 12:57 AM, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
Thus spake "Brian E Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Margaret Wasserman wrote:
...
SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES:
(1) This draft doesn't mention the reverse DNS tree. Is it expected
that
whatever registry assigns these values will also populate the
rev
Christian,
Christian Huitema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We generally shied away from the second solution, and generally fromusing the host identification query to provide reverse mappings.
Is "host identification query" == "Node Information Queries" here?
Also, what about other non-DNS naming
in line...
Stephen Sprunk wrote:
>
> Thus spake "Brian E Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> > ...
> > > SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES:
> > >
> > > (1) This draft doesn't mention the reverse DNS tree. Is it expected
> that
> > > whatever registry assigns these values will al
Thus spake "Brian E Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> ...
> > SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES:
> >
> > (1) This draft doesn't mention the reverse DNS tree. Is it expected
that
> > whatever registry assigns these values will also populate the
reverse
> > DNS tree? Or not?
>
Margaret Wasserman wrote:
...
> SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES:
>
> (1) This draft doesn't mention the reverse DNS tree. Is it expected that
> whatever registry assigns these values will also populate the reverse
> DNS tree? Or not?
I think it is better to leave this question for a separate docum
