Hi, all.
I have a question about a router behavior.
rfc2461 and 2461bis assume that
the router can stop packet forwarding without disabling to send RA.
draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-01.txt
6.2.5. Ceasing To Be An Advertising Interface
---
Thanks to Anoop and Juergen for your clarify.
That is only my trivial suggestion of redefinition semantics for 0xF.
After all, 0xF has been a valid value of flow label. Originally, I just
think only 20-bits is enough.
To say the least, Flow label TC need really a wildcard？In a application
> Mark,
>
> At 03:16 PM 11/29/2004, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > Section 4.4 DNS Issues
> >
> > This sections appears to be a real cop out.
> >
> > It is perfectly natural for clients to want to make queries and
> > have these addresses returned from the DNS.
>
> Th
Mark,
At 03:16 PM 11/29/2004, Mark Andrews wrote:
Section 4.4 DNS Issues
This sections appears to be a real cop out.
It is perfectly natural for clients to want to make queries and
have these addresses returned from the DNS.
There is a wide range of views on what is
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:49:27AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> RFC 3595 - Textual Conventions for IPv6 Flow Label refers to:
> "IPv6FlowLabelOrAny ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
>DISPLAY-HINT "d"
>STATUS current
>DESCRIPTION "The flow identifier or Flow Label in an
