IESG Comments about ICMPv6 draft: Authentication and Confidentiality of ICMP messages

2005-02-24 Thread Mukesh . K . Gupta
Hi All, Allison had the following comment to the ICMPv6 draft as part of the IESG review: > 1. IPSec processing considerations about ICMP are enough >different in the bis ESP and AH specs that I think this >document should update to require these (just approved). I looked at ESP and AH

Re: RFC 2461[bis]: RS with srcaddr but w/o SLLAO

2005-02-24 Thread Radhakrishnan Suryanarayanan
Hi Hesham,all IMHO, its good to have text reflecting chritian's concerns. I does make sense to have the clarifications in place across the sections 6.2.6, 7.2.3, 7.2.4. Regards Radhakrishnan - Original Message - From: "Soliman, Hesham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "JINM

draft-main-ipaddr-text-rep revived

2005-02-24 Thread Zefram
Back in 2003 we discussed an I-D I wrote that defines precisely the textual representation of IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. There was then a lull in proceedings, and I then dropped out of the WG for health reasons, so it's turned into quite an extended lull. Bob Hinden has now prodded me to get things