where to download c model of ipV6

2005-03-10 Thread jeff
hi guys: I am a newbee in this forum.Now I just wanna study ipV6,so is there any body can enlighten me where can I download the C model implementation of IPv6 algorithm. Thanks in advance! jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 　　2005-03-11

RE: DHCPv6

2005-03-10 Thread timothy enos
smime.p7m Description: S/MIME encrypted message IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6

Re: Updated V2 "Revised ULA DNS text"

2005-03-10 Thread Bob Hinden
Tim, At 09:29 AM 03/10/2005, Tim Chown wrote: It may be pedantic, but should we not say "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses" rather than "locally assigned Local IPv6 addresses" or perhaps "locally assigned Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses"? It also isn't wholly clear whether Unique Local IPv6

Re: 'smicng' compiler giving error for 'IP-MIB'

2005-03-10 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 05:24:31PM +0530, Subrahmanya Hegde wrote: > If we use INTEGER instead of RowStatus it works fine. > > can you please let us know whether this will be taken care by > the IPV6 working group. My understanding is that this needs to be taken care of by Dave Perkins who wrote

Re: Updated V2 "Revised ULA DNS text"

2005-03-10 Thread Tim Chown
It may be pedantic, but should we not say "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses" rather than "locally assigned Local IPv6 addresses" or perhaps "locally assigned Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses"? It also isn't wholly clear whether Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses and/or Centrally Assigned U

Re: Updated "Revised ULA DNS text"

2005-03-10 Thread Stephen Sprunk
Thus spake "Bob Hinden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I have a small preference for "not recommended" instead of a lower case > "should not" (lowercase for the reasons Pekka stated) because I think "not > recommended" is stronger. But it's not a big issue either way and I am > happy to make the change if

Updated V2 "Revised ULA DNS text"

2005-03-10 Thread Bob Hinden
Here is an update to the update with the added text suggested by Mark Smith. Please review. Thanks, Bob --- 4.4 DNS Issues At the present time and PTR records for locally assigned local IPv6 addresses are not recommended to be installed in the global DNS. For backg

Re: Updated "Revised ULA DNS text"

2005-03-10 Thread Bob Hinden
Mark, Maybe a "SHOULD NOT" rather than "are not recommended to" in the first sentence ? "not recommended" reads to me that, well, it isn't recommended, however, if you do, the consequences aren't all that great. While that may actually be the case in this scenario, I'd think people would be lookin

Re: DHCPv6

2005-03-10 Thread Brian Haberman
In-line... On Mar 9, 2005, at 23:52, timothy enos wrote: -Original Message- From: Brian Haberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 10:15 AM To: timothy enos Cc: 'IPv6 WG' Subject: Re: DHCPv6 Hi Brian, I am actually aware that RFC 3879 only applies to depreca

'smicng' compiler giving error for 'IP-MIB'

2005-03-10 Thread Subrahmanya Hegde
Hi, I have extracted IP-MIB from: ftp://ftp.isi.edu/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2011-update-10.txt SMICNG compiler complains for this definition: OBJECT ipAddressRowStatus SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1) } MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "An agent is not require