> On Sat, 14 May 2005 02:57:33 +0900,
> JINMEI Tatuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> As I answered at this list, 2461bis and 2462bis should be updated at
> the same timing, so we'll eventually need to wait for 2461bis to be
> approved. If we reach the point, please just keep 2461bis sleepin
Hi Jinmei,
At 2:57 AM +0900 5/14/05, JINMEI Tatuya /
=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= wrote:
I've asked related questions about this comment on the wg list two
times, including requested information at the Minneapolis meeting, but
I've not got any responses...if this comment does not require
