Jinmei,
Thanks for your effort of revising the document. I've reviewed the
latest draft, and have some comments. (I must confess in advance that
I don't fully remember the past discussions on this document, and that
I may be repeating points already discussed before.)
I have a few thoughts on you
> On Mon, 9 May 2005 10:56:35 -0400,
> Brian Haberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> A refreshed version of the ICMP Name Lookups draft is available.
> I would especially like WG members who have implementations to
> review the draft and point out discrepancies between the spec and
> t
Hi,
The proposed changes in Section 2.7 on Multicast Addresses and Section 4.0
IANA Considerations can be found below. The changes are based on the
issues raised by Thomas Narten and the IANA. I believe this will resolve
the issues.
The complete document can be found at:
http://people.nokia
Let me just start off by saying I pretty much agree completely with
what Bernie just said.
I've also reviewed this document, and I am really wondering what this
document is trying to achieve. It seems to me that its added a lot of
text (that IMO is not really needed). In particular, I don't think
> On Mon, 16 May 2005 09:56:26 -0400,
> "Bernie Volz (volz)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I haven't followed this thread carefully, but are you trying to suggest
> that if the M flag is set but O is not, that a client would IGNORE the
> other configuration parameters received from a DHCP s
