> On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 12:16:48 -0400,
> Bill Fenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> So, I guess the appropriate next step for this work is to make
>> consensus on this, which mostly equals to my question -1:
>>
>> -1. are we okay with forcing URL/URI parsers to understand the
>> detailed sem
Here's an ID for consideration by the IPv6 WG.
Background:
Discussion on the more general topic took place at the April ARIN and
May RIPE meetings. A good summary of those presentations can be found
at:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-50/presentations/ripe50-plenary-wed-ipv6-roundtable-r
