> -Original Message-
> From: Syam Madanapalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 802.16 is point-to-multipoint connection oriented technology. There
> will be a seperate connection for each subscriber station
> from base station.
> A subsriber station cannot establish a direct connection to
>
802.16 is point-to-multipoint connection oriented technology. There
will be a seperate connection for each subscriber station from base station.
A subsriber station cannot establish a direct connection to another subscriber
station. The 802.16 connection just covers the last mile. So I am not sure
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Nordmark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> IEEE 802.16 also has different support for broadcast and
> multicast than
> Ethernet (don't you love it when IEEE 802 designs standards
> that don't
> conform to the IEEE 802.1 LAN service model ;-)
>
> Folks ha
Yes, I've been of the opinion for some time that the IP over ATM and other
nonbroadcast links work might be relevent. The arugment against this has
been that 802.16 nodes don't have direct contact with their neighbors
because they have to go through the base station, but I am not sure why this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I meant was the scope - is it simply IPv6 over Foo, or something
more. Thanks for reminding me aobut the different convergence
sub-layers,
I had forgotten about that. This does make things more interesting.
IEEE 802.16 also has different support for broadcast and
On 5/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bob,
>> How important is this? I didn't make the meeting at the last IETF
>> meeting, but in Vancouver, it didn't seem like they were planning any
>> big work items.
>
>It's another IPv6 over effort. What makes this one more
>complica
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the info, you're right that I hadn't see this. I'll look
through
the procedings now.
thanks,
John
>-Original Message-
>From: ext Soohong Daniel Park [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 03 May, 2006 09:37
>To: Hinden Bob (Nokia-ES/MtView); Loughney John (Nokia-NRC/He
Hi Bob,
>> How important is this? I didn't make the meeting at the last IETF
>> meeting, but in Vancouver, it didn't seem like they were planning any
>> big work items.
>
>It's another IPv6 over effort. What makes this one more
>complicated is it's not just another Ethernet compatible
>netwo
John - Probably, you saw the "IPv6 over foo" only
at the 1st BOF in Vancouver. Through the 2nd BOF
in Dallas, "IPv4 over foo" was added into the 16ng scope.
It may make you to feel a bit big items on the charter.
Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
Mobile Convergence Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics.
-
