Hello Pars,
Response inline:
On 8/10/06 12:38 PM, "ext Pars MUTAF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Selon Basavaraj Patil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>
>> Inline:
>>
>>
>> On 8/10/06 8:52 AM, "ext Pars Mutaf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm still trying to understand t
Hello Erik,
FRD may help snding an RA when the host wakes up and filters
all multicast RAs. This is problem for hosts that are active,
because FRD will not be able to send RAs to the active hosts.
Or the AP/BS can do the selective filtering for the hosts that are
sleeping?
And by the way, will t
Hello Erik,
On 8/11/06, Erik Nordmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Syam Madanapalli wrote:
> I am not sure if this works.
> Let us say the router lifetime is X seconds
> and the host wakes up every Y seconds to retrieve
> any packets from the AP/BS.
> If Y > X then we are not solving the problem.
Syam Madanapalli wrote:
I am not sure if this works.
Let us say the router lifetime is X seconds
and the host wakes up every Y seconds to retrieve
any packets from the AP/BS.
If Y > X then we are not solving the problem.
I think you need to explain what would fail in that case.
In my simple v
Selon Basavaraj Patil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Inline:
>
>
> On 8/10/06 8:52 AM, "ext Pars Mutaf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm still trying to understand the problem :-)
> > Unless I missed an episode, the context is
> > connection-oriented cellular networks under IP
> >
Inline:
On 8/10/06 8:52 AM, "ext Pars Mutaf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm still trying to understand the problem :-)
> Unless I missed an episode, the context is
> connection-oriented cellular networks under IP
> (whatever that means)
>
> You say that the RA packets (unicas
Hello,
I'm still trying to understand the problem :-)
Unless I missed an episode, the context is
connection-oriented cellular networks under IP
(whatever that means)
You say that the RA packets (unicasted) will wake up
90% of hosts in the subnet. Because roughly %90 of
hosts are dormant, in
In your previous mail you wrote:
I am not sure I understand your argument that the issue of sending periodic
RAs should be handled at the link-layer.
=> I don't understand how my argument was translated in this one too (:-).
If the network layer is going to send the periodic RA, how do
I actually put a script together to generate the prefix during the IETF
in Montreal. I handed that code to someone who is planning on making
it available on a web page "real soon".
Regards,
Brian
On Aug 9, 2006, at 5:49, SUZUKI Shinsuke wrote:
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 13:14:32 +0200
[EMAIL PROTE
