Selon "Manfredi, Albert E" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think Pars' point is not restricted to L2 mechanisms, though. No
> matter what layer has to wake up a dormant host, bandwidth will be
> consumed at multiple base stations to achieve this?
>
Yes that's right. Thanks!
pars
> Bert
>
>
> > -
Selon James Kempf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So here's a counter example.
>
> Suppose there is an IP based but wireless link layer specific protocol that
> lets BSes communicate about dormant mode hosts. When a host goes into
> dormant mode, all BSes in the paging area learn about it via the protocol.
Right, but that's not my point.
My point is that it's possible to concieve of link specifric mechanisms that
make filtering work.
Furthermore, this is all hypothetical. The other SDOs are going to do it
however they want to anyway, and they, ultimately, are the ones who control
how paging wo
I think Pars' point is not restricted to L2 mechanisms, though. No
matter what layer has to wake up a dormant host, bandwidth will be
consumed at multiple base stations to achieve this?
Bert
> -Original Message-
> From: James Kempf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September
So here's a counter example.
Suppose there is an IP based but wireless link layer specific protocol that
lets BSes communicate about dormant mode hosts. When a host goes into
dormant mode, all BSes in the paging area learn about it via the protocol.
When paging happens, this protocol is used b
Selon James Kempf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There is an assumption here that the "L2 paging system" is run off the AR.
> This is not necesarily the case. It won't be for Wimax, for example.
Hello,
OK. The discussion about Wimax now ;-)
But this should be orthogonal to our problem. In paging, in gen
There is an assumption here that the "L2 paging system" is run off the AR.
This is not necesarily the case. It won't be for Wimax, for example.
jak
- Original Message -
From: "Pars MUTAF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Kempf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Erik Nordmark" <[EMAIL
Selon James Kempf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Why can't the BS simply filter the RA? It looks at the IP packet header, if
> the packet was sent to All Hosts Multicast and it's ICMP RA it drops that
> packet for those mobile nodes that are dormant.
Because by the time the BS received the RA, the host
Why can't the BS simply filter the RA? It looks at the IP packet header, if
the packet was sent to All Hosts Multicast and it's ICMP RA it drops that
packet for those mobile nodes that are dormant.
jak
- Original Message -
From: "Pars Mutaf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 20:02 +0200, Pars Mutaf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The issue was raised again in 16ng, so I'm trying to help
> moving forward on this issue. (I dropped out my dormant mode
> reliability concerns for future work, but I hope this has
> complemented the discussion.)
>
> I have a coup
10 matches
Mail list logo