Re: Link Local Address

Hi, Since Link Local Address is basic for interface's ipv6 capability, such as usage by ND, I also agree not to forward packets at this case. Thanks Leon - Original Message - From: "JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Hanamantapppa Yuvraj-A21366" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc:

RE: Last Call: 'Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6)' to Draft Standard (draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis)

ok, sounds good to me, which means we have no open issues on the draft. Hesham > -Original Message- > From: Basavaraj Patil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 2:51 AM > To: ext JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 ; Soliman, Hesham > Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; Thomas Narten >

Re: Link Local Address

> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:02:19 +0800, > "Hanamantapppa Yuvraj-A21366" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Suppose for a Router Fast Ethernet interface has a following > configuration > Link Local Address which is Tentative, and the Primary IPv6 address is > Up. With this should I be able to forwa

DNA protocol document: Review requested

Hi Folks, The dna working group has been working on enhancements to IPV6 neighbor discovery to quickly detect link changes. The protocol is nearing completion and we would like to solicit the IPv6 wg and the intarea ML for comments since this is a pretty significant update to IPv6 neighbor d

humid code

Code (simple, just to show the principle, and README): http://www.freewebs.com/pmutaf/humid_code.tgz Motivations: http://www.freewebs.com/pmutaf/draft-mutaf-ipv6humid-02.txt Thanks, pars (ps: sensor folks are also interested.) ---

Re: Last Call: 'Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6)' to Draft Standard (draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis)

Hesham, I like Jinmei's proposal of rejecting the issue as far as changing 2461bis value goes. Because even the Max value of 2999 seconds is still not good enough for some links. So I think it is best to let IPv6 over foo specific documents specify what router configuration variables are modifie