Thanks for the comments! Sorry for the late reply. Some comments inline
> I have one question on the protocol, and several on documentation.
> Since this is a significant protocol, documentation is very
> important.
> For the sake of new implementors I have a number of suggestions for
> cl
Thomas, I agree with everything you say below except that some of what
you say may, in fact, be the justifications we are looking for. I
didn't say examples, I said explanations. See below ...
On 11/22/2006 09:06 AM, Thomas Narten allegedly wrote:
> Scott W Brim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>
Scott W Brim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have one question on the protocol, and several on documentation.
> Since this is a significant protocol, documentation is very important.
> For the sake of new implementors I have a number of suggestions for
> clarity. Many of them have to do with the
