Alexandru Petrescu writes:
> James Carlson wrote:
> > Alexandru Petrescu writes:
> >> While the document does talk about stateless address autoconf I
> >> think it should also talk about ND. I think it should mention
> >> whether - or not - it's possible, feasible, has been done or
> >> probabl
James Carlson wrote:
Alexandru Petrescu writes:
While the document does talk about stateless address autoconf I
think it should also talk about ND. I think it should mention
whether - or not - it's possible, feasible, has been done or
probable, to run IPv6 ND over a ppp link.
It's being don
Alexandru Petrescu writes:
> While the document does talk about stateless address autoconf I think it
> should also talk about ND. I think it should mention whether - or not -
> it's possible, feasible, has been done or probable, to run IPv6 ND over
> a ppp link.
It's being done today. RFC 2461
Eliot Lear wrote:
Brian Haberman wrote:
Comments, questions, or concerns?
Sure. I've got one. What conclusion are we to draw from this lack of
implementation reports on compression? Is it really the case that
people are implementing IPv6 over PPP without compression, or is it that
t
