At Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:46:28 +0300,
Jari Arkko wrote:
>
>
> > Just in case folks are missing out on this, find below a rather nasty
> > security issue.
> >
>
> I cannot say that this is a big surprise, even if the specific attack
> is news to me and it has a major impact. Some issues with Typ
> Just in case folks are missing out on this, find below a rather nasty
> security issue.
>
I cannot say that this is a big surprise, even if the specific attack
is news to me and it has a major impact. Some issues with Type 0
have been known for years; I think draft-savola-ipv6-rh-ha was the
Hi All,
This is my first mail to Ipv6 working group. I am interested in
getting some statistical data/ other relevant information
regarding,
1. How big is the issue of Ipv6 path MTU calculation? How often the pack is
dropped because of path MTU lesser than
the packet size? How often fra
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:39:26 +0530, vijay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am interested in knowing if the path MTU is a problem in real networks
Yes it is. Some people have a 1492 MTU due to PPP encapsulation; some have
9000+ such a gigabit links. And in IPv6 case, 1480 (and 1472) are fairly
commo
Hi All,
I am currently analyzing the IPv6 path MTU.
As the IPv6 path MTU calculation is done by error correction method, I was
thinking of suggesting a
proposal for calculating the path MTU optimally. I am interested in knowing
if the path MTU is a problem
in real networks and how of
Dear all,
This is a remainder.
The Registration for TAHI Interoperability Test Event will be closed on
27th Apr (17P.M. JST).
If you are planning to participate to the Event, please make a
registration as soon as possible.
You can make a registration on http://www.tahi.org/inop/9thinterop.htm
