Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
27.27% |6 | 26.13% |53657 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
13.64% |3 | 17.58% |36102 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4.55% |1 | 20.13% |41334 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
9.09% |2 | 11.60% |238
> You shouldn't.
>
> You SHOULD remember that ND is *NOT* mandately for IPv6.
just for clarification - which part of ND (RS/RA, NS/NA, or something
else), and under which condition?
itojun
IETF IPv6 working gro
Leino, Tammy wrote:
> I appreciate everyone's comments and advice. I am glad to see such
> passion for IPv6 and support of people in need.
You shouldn't.
You SHOULD remember that ND is *NOT* mandately for IPv6.
ND is, despite a lot of effort to fix it in some limited cases (an
obvious example
This issue was discussed in the dhc and v6ops WGs at the last IETF
meeting: http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/07jul/slides/dhc-5.pdf
- Ralph
On Aug 10, 2007, at Aug 10, 2007,6:28 PM, Leino, Tammy wrote:
Thank you John.
Has your working group considered adding this as a DHCPv6 option?
If t
At Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:55:18 -0500,
"Leino, Tammy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I add an address in my OS, I add a network route according to the
> prefix length of the address so I know that other nodes with this same
> prefix are on-link. I don't route based on a source address. I find a
