Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf

2007-10-01 Thread Ralph Droms
Ah, OK, thanks for the clarification... - Ralph On Oct 1, 2007, at Oct 1, 2007,1:23 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: On 1-okt-2007, at 19:09, Ralph Droms wrote: Didn't you write recently that you knew of no DHCPv6 implementations when you wrote your book? I don't think so. I probably said

Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf

2007-10-01 Thread Jim Jackson
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Brian Dickson wrote: > Ralph Droms wrote: > > Cisco's CNR and IOS DHCPv6 servers both implement PD. The IOS DHCPv6 > > client implements PD, and can automatically assign /64s from a > > delegated prefix to downstream interfaces. > I'm a bit confused by the above. It might b

Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf

2007-10-01 Thread Brian Dickson
Ralph Droms wrote: Cisco's CNR and IOS DHCPv6 servers both implement PD. The IOS DHCPv6 client implements PD, and can automatically assign /64s from a delegated prefix to downstream interfaces. I'm a bit confused by the above. It might be terminology, or your use of it, but either way, it woul

Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf

2007-10-01 Thread Iljitsch van Beijnum
On 1-okt-2007, at 19:09, Ralph Droms wrote: Didn't you write recently that you knew of no DHCPv6 implementations when you wrote your book? I don't think so. I probably said no implementations that do address assignment.

RE: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf

2007-10-01 Thread Templin, Fred L
> ??? > > Do you mean: can it assign interface addresses from the delegated > prefixes via DHCPv6 on downstream interfaces as well? Let's say that I'm a requesting router, and all I need is a /128. Shouldn't I be able to ask a delegating router for a /128, and then assign it to one of my downst

Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf

2007-10-01 Thread Ralph Droms
??? Do you mean: can it assign interface addresses from the delegated prefixes via DHCPv6 on downstream interfaces as well? - Ralph On Oct 1, 2007, at Oct 1, 2007,1:12 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote: Cisco's CNR and IOS DHCPv6 servers both implement PD. The IOS DHCPv6 client implements PD

RE: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf

2007-10-01 Thread Templin, Fred L
> Cisco's CNR and IOS DHCPv6 servers both implement PD. The IOS DHCPv6 > client implements PD, and can automatically assign /64s from a > delegated prefix to downstream interfaces. That's good. Can it also do /128's? Thanks - Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf

2007-10-01 Thread Ralph Droms
Didn't you write recently that you knew of no DHCPv6 implementations when you wrote your book? - Ralph On Oct 1, 2007, at Oct 1, 2007,12:21 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: On 1-okt-2007, at 16:01, Templin, Fred L wrote: I would be interested to know who has implemented and/or is using DHC

Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf

2007-10-01 Thread Ralph Droms
Cisco's CNR and IOS DHCPv6 servers both implement PD. The IOS DHCPv6 client implements PD, and can automatically assign /64s from a delegated prefix to downstream interfaces. - Ralph On Oct 1, 2007, at Oct 1, 2007,10:01 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote: I would be interested to know who has impl

Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf

2007-10-01 Thread Iljitsch van Beijnum
On 1-okt-2007, at 16:01, Templin, Fred L wrote: I would be interested to know who has implemented and/or is using DHCPv6 prefix delegation (RFC3633), because I'm seeing some interesting use cases for it. When I was writing my book ( http://www.runningipv6.net/ ) in 2005 I did some testing be

RE: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf

2007-10-01 Thread James Carlson
Templin, Fred L writes: > I would be interested to know who has implemented and/or > is using DHCPv6 prefix delegation (RFC3633), because I'm > seeing some interesting use cases for it. Yep. And I know I haven't implemented it. ;-} -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROT

RE: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf

2007-10-01 Thread Templin, Fred L
I would be interested to know who has implemented and/or is using DHCPv6 prefix delegation (RFC3633), because I'm seeing some interesting use cases for it. Thanks - Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: James Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 01, 20

Re: 6MAN WG Last Call:

2007-10-01 Thread James Carlson
Brian Haberman writes: > Filename: draft-ietf-ipv6-compression-nego-v2-00.txt Section 6.1 ("Normative References") refers to a draft that doesn't seem to exist -- drafts-ietf-ipv6-over-ppp-v2-03.txt. It should probably be corrected to RFC 5072 now. For section 4 ("IANA Consideratio

Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf

2007-10-01 Thread James Carlson
Ralph Droms writes: > Cisco has had DHCPv6 (client, server and relay agent) in IOS since > 2003. The first TAHI DHCPv6 testing was also in 2003. Results from > the interoperability testing of several servers and clients was used > to improve the DHCPv6 spec (RFC 3315), published in July 200

6MAN WG Last Call:

2007-10-01 Thread Brian Haberman
All, This starts a two-week 6MAN working group last call on advancing: Title : Negotiation for IPv6 datagram compression using IPv6 Control Protocol Author(s) : S. Varada Filename: draft-ietf-ipv6-compression-nego-v2-00.txt Pages : 7