Suresh Krishnan wrote:
Brian Dickson wrote:
james woodyatt wrote:
e.g. RFC 3041, SEND, et cetera.
For example, RFC 3041 is *very* easy to fix.
Where it uses "upper 64 bits" and "lower 64 bits", change it to upper
(length(ii)) bits, and lower (128 - length(ii)) bits.
If the II happens to be 4
Brian Dickson wrote:
james woodyatt wrote:
e.g. RFC 3041, SEND, et cetera.
For example, RFC 3041 is *very* easy to fix.
Where it uses "upper 64 bits" and "lower 64 bits", change it to upper
(length(ii)) bits, and lower (128 - length(ii)) bits.
If the II happens to be 48 bits, the upper 48 of
Hello 6man,
See below for a new draft on "Simple Packetization and
Reassembly for IP/*/IP Tunnel Endpoint MTUs (sprite-mtu)".
This document specifies mechanisms that update existing
mechanisms to address well-known MTU issues for IP/*/IP
tunnels (see: [RFC2923][RFC4459][RFC4963]).
There have been