On Mar 12, 2008, at 06:38, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:
>
> Change "transport layer header" to "upper layer header" because
I agree with that recommendation.
> 2. I and Wes don't agree at all with bullet 2 in section 4 (Future
> work)
> of this draft that says:
>
> [Extension headers must be p
Suresh,
First, one simple comment.
1. In section 1 of your draft you say
[may need to look at the transport layer header fields...]
Change "transport layer header" to "upper layer header" because
(a) You must use language consistent with RFC 2460.
(b) Use of transport layer is incorrect beca
