On 7/18/08 12:30 PM, "Mark Townsley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [4] http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/07dec/slides/v6ops-5/sld1.htm
For a more up to date reference, I would suggest to read:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-durand-dual-stack-lite-00.txt
- Alain.
---
Apologies for cross-posting, please reply only to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All,
Recent discussions in the IETF indicate that the IPv4 and IPv6
co-existence solutions we have available will not be sufficient for all
deployment scenarios which we expect to be necessary in the face of
pressures due to upc
Tatuya,
Thanks for all your email. Please see in line between and .
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 9:44 PM
To: Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
Cc: Hemant Singh (shemant); Suresh Krishnan; Thomas Narten; Brian
Haberman; Bob Hinden;
Tatuya & Erik,
Note, that our document is not killing on-link determination caching due
to two reasons:
1. We don't have any Normative text.
2. Killing means don't use cached information. Our new text is saying,
after re-init, deprecate cached information temporarily, verify
information, and if i
I support this document moving forward (with the minor fixes already
discussed on the list). Sorry for missing the last call deadline.
- Bernie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Brian Haberman
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 3:17 PM
To: ipv6@ie
