Teemu,
On 2008-10-27 19:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> Thank you for your responses, comment inline
>
>> As for your question, I would say that it depends on implementations.
>> AFAIK, there are already several opensources like ISC DHCP
>> which supports IA_NA(maybe IA_TA) as we
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:06:10AM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
> Neither is the current solution described by the RFCs: you are
> required to set up both your IPv6 routers and your DHCPv6 server in
> order for the system to work consistently.
James, we're talking about different things. You're st
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 04:18:48PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> Obviously multicasts are useful so I'm not saying we can't have any. But in
I just want to say that what I'm actually hearing in this is that
you'll waffle on the performance criteria you invented so long as it
means you get
On 24 okt 2008, at 18:38, David W. Hankins wrote:
What if DHCPv6 servers do not exist? AFAIK, in this thread, the cost
of unnecessary multicast DHCPv6 messages which may be prevented
through M&O bits are being discussed.
That's a separate issue. Iljitsch is proposing that Multicasts must
be
All,
The 6MAN Working Group will be meeting in Minneapolis. If you
have items you would like to see on the agenda, please let the chairs
know the topic, speaker, and requested amount of time.
Regards,
Brian & Bob
IETF I
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 08:15:54AM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
> Unless your DHCPv6 server box also happens to be an IPv6 router for
> the prefix in question, I don't think you should be trying to do
> anything with RS/RA messages.
I agree completely, I would rather not ever transmit an RA.
But s
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:23:55AM +0900, hyunwook cha wrote:
> What if DHCPv6 servers do not exist? AFAIK, in this thread, the cost
> of unnecessary multicast DHCPv6 messages which may be prevented
> through M&O bits are being discussed.
That's a separate issue. Iljitsch is proposing that Multic
