[trimming the cc's a bit...]
> I am not suggesting that the requirement that a device support
> 64-bit prefixes be relaxed. I am suggesting that the requirement
> that prefixes only be 64-bit be relaxed.
Whether we like it or not, the 64 bit IID requirement is fairly deeply
ingrained within IPv6.
Fred,
I am not suggesting that the requirement that a device support 64-bit
prefixes be relaxed. I am suggesting that the requirement that prefixes
only be 64-bit be relaxed.
Best Regards,
Jeffrey Dunn
Info Systems Eng., Lead
MITRE Corporation.
(301) 448-6965 (mobile)
-Original Messag
>-Original Message-
>From: Dunn, Jeffrey H. [mailto:jd...@mitre.org]
>Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 6:18 PM
>To: The IESG; IETF-Announce
>Cc: 6man chair; 6man mailing list; steve_eiser...@ao.uscourts.gov;
Internet Architecture Board; RFC
>Editor
>Subject: RE: Protocol Action: 'Reserved
Jari and Brian,
Would the 6man group consider an update to RFC 4291 that is contains
less prescriptive language? If so, I would be happy to undertake that
task. Please let me know.
Best Regards,
Jeffrey Dunn
Info Systems Eng., Lead
MITRE Corporation.
(301) 448-6965 (mobile)
-Original
