I agree with everything Роман Донченко wrote.
I just wanted to comment these two things:
4.2. "::" Usage
4.2.1. shorten as much as possible
4.2.2. One 16 bit 0 Field
4.2.3. When "::" Can Be Used Twice
When cases where it is possible to use "::" in two or more different
sections of an addr
Greetings,
I want to offer a couple of comments/suggestions for this draft.
Editorial.
A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation
Given that the focus of the draft is on defining a canonical
representation format, I think it would be usefu
Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
[...]
Also, it might be worth to have an socket API consideration appendix...
Yes, it would need a small API update to work - this can be described if
people want to progress this.
Just a socket option would be enough. I kind of feel like th
Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
Hello,
I take the freedom to move this to 6man mailing list...
Thanks, please see below.
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:30:54 +0100, Gorry Fairhurst
wrote:
Have you any comments on:
draft-fairhurst-6man-tsvwg-udptt-01
I am trying to figure-out whether this is a good
