Dave,
I have snipped some text (show between square brackets) from the slides
you sent us with my response below the text. The summary from my
comments is that we need more data from you, and in a case or two, the
security problem does not exist.
[a malicious user may try to spoof a link-l
Thank you, Tatsuya, for your thorough review.
I think both of your points are apposite. We'll reflect them into the -01
version.
Thanks again,
Miya
> -Original Message-
> From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 [mailto:jin...@isc.org]
> Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 2:37 PM
> To: Miya Kohno; Bec
Using UDP-Lite would be fine. I'm not sure how a transition to UDP with
no checksum would help the transport concerns with mis-delivery, etc.
Gorry
Margaret Wasserman wrote:
I had a thought on the use of zero UDP checksums in IPv6...
What if we allowed the use of zero checksums for UDP as a
Dave,
Thanks for sending the slides our way. When I find time later in the
day, I will respond to text in the slides. If you are in Hiroshima, if
you can find me, we can certainly talk as well.I will be
presenting/supporting our IPv6 CPE Rtr document in v6ops at this IETF
which is one goo
(resending as I seem to have submitted the original one from the wrong
address)
At Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:24:47 -0400,
Brian Haberman wrote:
> Title : IPv6 Subnet Model: the Relationship between
> Links and Subnet Prefixes
> Author(s) : H. Singh, et al.
> Fil
(resending as I seem to have submitted the original one from the wrong
address)
I've read this draft. I don't have a strong opinion on the proposal
per se, but have a couple of minor comments:
1. In Section 4, the draft says:
However, Subnet-router
anycast address has not been implemented
For those Microsoft challenged... my apologies in advance
D
Attached are a series of charts that outlines a problem the Broadband Forum is
wrestling with in the IPv6 space, the charts are in effect a companion to a
liaison sent to INTAREA. I understand agendas are full so there will not be
tim
I had a thought on the use of zero UDP checksums in IPv6...
What if we allowed the use of zero checksums for UDP as a _negotiated
option_ in IETF tunneling protocols? Those protocols could default to
the use of UDP Lite (or UDP with non-zero checksums if their designers
prefer) and negoti
