Hi,
On 2010/01/19, at 10:26, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Rémi,
>
> On 2010-01-19 01:46, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:13:16 +0900, Arifumi Matsumoto
>> wrote:
>>> * Fred's proposal.
>>> - A host tries each pair of src and dst addresses to establish
>>> a connection in a sh
Hi,
>>>
>>> Missing a Pro that I consider significant:
>>>
>>> - Users will no longer experience multi-second connection
>> delays due
>>> to IPv6's address selection. This means more users will
>>> leave IPv6 enabled.
>>
>> not due to IPv6's address selection, but due to IPv6 connection
Let me re-send the following e-mail.
It did not make it to 6man ml web archive.
---
Hi,
>>>
>>> Missing a Pro that I consider significant:
>>>
>>> - Users will no longer experience multi-second connection
>> delays due
>>> to IPv6's address selection. This means more users will
>>> leave
On 2010-01-22 03:54, Brian Haberman wrote:
> On 1/19/10 9:51 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> On 2010-01-20 15:22, Ranjith ..knowing peking wrote:
>>> Most of the current implementations of ULA does not support automatic
>>> generation of the global IDs corresponding to the ULAs. Users have to
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Arifumi Matsumoto [mailto:arif...@nttv6.net]
> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 1:51 AM
> To: Dan Wing
> Cc: 'IETF IPv6 Mailing List'; "'"'Rémi Denis-Courmont'"'";
> draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-...@tools.ietf.org;
> draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-considerati.
On 1/19/10 9:51 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 2010-01-20 15:22, Ranjith ..knowing peking wrote:
>> Most of the current implementations of ULA does not support automatic
>> generation of the global IDs corresponding to the ULAs. Users have to
>> generate the global id by using some external
