Hi Brian,
There was a discussion we had regarding the Flow label about 4 years back.
It may be of use for your draft.
Here is the link:
http://www.ops.ietf.org/lists/v6ops/v6ops.2006/threads.html#00010
Thanks,
Vishwas
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpen...@gmail.
Hi,
I'm generally happy with the changes.
However, I am slightly bothered by this:
For URIs, [RFC3986] MUST be followed.
RFC 3986 allows any syntax that conforms to its BNF, and for
IPv6 literals, that BNF implements RFC 3513 (the predecessor
of RFC 4291). If you strictly obey the sentence q
I have reviewed this draft. The draft is in good shape and a welcome
clarification. However, I had two small issues I wanted to talk about
before moving the draft to last call:
5. Hosts MUST verify that on-link information is still valid after
IPv6 interface re-initialization before usin
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
Title : A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation
Author(s) : S. Kawamura, M. Kawashima
