Woj,
Three questions for the group:
1. Is there a practical limit to the number of route entries?
2. Is there a practical need to pad in DHCP?
3. Would it be better to provide a seed address into some sort of
routing function so that the information can change without having to
monkey with
Hi Folks,
About 1 year ago we put together draft-dec-dhcpv6-route-option
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dec-dhcpv6-route-option), which after
having been presented and initially discussed in the DHC WG, was deemed
by the ADs (Ralph and Jari) to require 6man discussion before going any
further.
Hi,
Some comments inline.
On Mar 4, 2010, at 10:20 AM, lizhenqi...@chinamobile.com wrote:
> I did not see the mail I posted to 3gv6 and ipv6 mailing list using foxmail.
> Sent it out again using web mail. Sorry for possible duplication.
> ///
>
> Hi, Raj,
>
> What
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi Sheng
I have had requests from enterprise
network managers that they did not like
IPv6 addresses generated autonomously by
a node. I though this draft addresses such
issues and there probably are needs out there.
I was quite surprised that it will
I did not see the mail I posted to 3gv6 and ipv6 mailing list using foxmail.
Sent it out again using web mail. Sorry for possible duplication.
///
Hi, Raj,
What a long easy-reading informational draft.
Some comments:
1)Add Serving Gateway in the Terminology part sinc
