I don't know if it has been discussed here earlier or if it was in another
context.
I think it'd be of interest to standardize a way of "exposing" part of
internal IPv6 policy to the rest of the world. What I'd like to achieve is
the following:
Being able to expose to others who owns what
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Things To Be Included in RFC 3484 Revision
Author(s) : A. Matsumoto, et al.
Filename
Hi Woj,
thx for your answer. I think, that you 've misunderstood / misinterpreted my
words. I'm sure that you know very well that a service provider wants to change
as little as possible and that he can not influence / modify all host
implementations on customer site.
Regarding I-D krishnan-r
Olaf,
>> let us say we have 5 classes of host implementations:
>>
>> 1) IPv4 only and those which will never be upgraded with IPv6 support
>> 2) partly broken IPv6 support and without DHCPv6
>> 3) partly broken IPv6 support with DHCPv6
>> 4) full IPv6 support without DHCPv6
>> 5) full IPv6 suppor
On 13 September 2010 08:49, wrote:
> Hi Woj,
>
> thx for your comments. I nearly forgot that an ISP has to offer its
> customers a good service, thx for reminding me ;-).
> I'm just inserting as an answer a sentence, I found in an email posted by
> Tom Petch on this mailing list in another conte
Hi Ole,
thx for your analysis of the problem space.
Please find my comments in line.
Ciao
Olaf
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Ole Troan [mailto:ichiroumak...@gmail.com] Im Auftrag
> von Ole Troan
> Gesendet: Montag, 13. September 2010 09:16
> An: Bonneß, Olaf
> Cc: wdec.i...
Le 13 sept. 2010 à 01:38, Brian E Carpenter a écrit :
> On 2010-09-10 00:09, Rémi Després wrote:
> ...
>> R3. Intermediate nodes MAY replace null FL values by non-zero FL values,
>> PROVIDED these non-zero values generally differ from a flow to another.
>
> IMHO that isn't a strong enough condi
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Ole Troan wrote:
4) full IPv6 support without DHCPv6
we don't care about 1. we do _not_ want to deliver IPv6 service to 2 +
3. so the problematic one is 4. does anyone know of any class 4 IPv6
implementation?
I'd imagine cany class 4 IPv6 devices will quickly be pushed
Olaf,
> thx for your comments. I nearly forgot that an ISP has to offer its customers
> a good service, thx for reminding me ;-).
> I'm just inserting as an answer a sentence, I found in an email posted by Tom
> Petch on this mailing list in another context:
>
> Tom Petch wrote on Fr 10.09.201
