On Sep 18, 2010, at 02:22, JP Vasseur wrote:
>
> On Sep 15, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>
>>> Has anybody discussed adding a header with just the 3 bytes you need
>>> *before* the IP header?
>>
>> Yes. Ever since you proposed pretty much that at a previous IETF meeting,
>> I've
Le 18 sept. 2010 à 02:22, JP Vasseur a écrit :
> On Sep 15, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> ...
>>
>> However, it would be pretty easy to put something in 6lowpan to carry those
>> 3 bytes.
>> (Consider it an advanced form of header compression for the 48-byte IP-in-IP
>> thing, if y
On Sep 15, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>> Has anybody discussed adding a header with just the 3 bytes you need
>> *before* the IP header?
>
> Yes. Ever since you proposed pretty much that at a previous IETF meeting,
> I've been thinking that architecturally it makes a lot of sens
