- Original Message
> From: Bob Hinden
> To: IPv6 WG Mailing List
> Cc: Bob Hinden
> Sent: Thu, October 21, 2010 1:56:00 PM
> Subject: Re: Consensus call on adopting
>
> One personal comment,
>
> I think the title should be changed to something like "Line Identification
>Destin
- Original Message
> From: Bob Hinden
> To: IPv6 WG Mailing List
> Cc: Bob Hinden
> Sent: Thu, October 21, 2010 1:56:00 PM
> Subject: Re: Consensus call on adopting
>
> One personal comment,
>
> I think the title should be changed to something like "Line Identification
>Destin
One personal comment,
I think the title should be changed to something like "Line Identification
Destination Option" as it is proposing to create a new destination option and
uses tunneling. In other words, it is no longer adding line identification to
RS messages.
Bob
On Oct 21, 2010, at
6MAN WG,
This is a consensus call on adopting:
Title : Line identification in IPv6 Router Solicitation
messages
Author(s) : S. Krishnan, et al.
Filename : draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt
Pages : 9
Date : 2010-09-20
http://tools.ietf.org/ht
Indeed, the use of this mechanism, to support a ds-lite tunnel initiated
from a handset, is rather puzzling. How will the operator know which handset
supports ds-lite, and what should happen if one doesn't?
Regards,
Wojtek.
On 14 October 2010 15:11, Maglione Roberta <
roberta.magli...@telecomital
