> > There is no way this is an erratum. There was a clear choice in the WG
> > to standardise on lower case.
>
> Glad to hear this. I reacted very much like Jeroen Massar. "That's SO last
> century!"
Agreed. I find lower case much more readable, and the errata should
not be accepted.
Steinar Ha
We examined many implementations before proposal.
Many implementations (such as Windows, Linux, FreeBSD,
and many other network devices) display lower case.
I would like to ask simple question.
Can we change many implementations?
I think that is too late.
lowercase is already "de fact standard".
On 02/12/2010 06:45 p.m., Cutler James R wrote:
> Although the comments about "lazy" are specious, I support requiring
> uppercase display simply from the viewpoint of easy recognition by
> those of us with less-than-perfect visual acuity.
Huh? Increase the font size, get a larger display, etc.,
Hi,
This is intended to reflect the various comments made in Beijing,
notably strengthening the points about the flow label not being
changed en route. Please review - if the WG is generally OK
with this version, we'll start to think about RFC3697bis.
Brian + Sheng + Shane
Original Me
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Update to the IPv6 flow label specification
Author(s) : S. Amante, et al.
Filename:
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> There is no way this is an erratum. There was a clear choice in the WG
> to standardise on lower case.
Glad to hear this. I reacted very much like Jeroen Massar. "That's SO last
century!"
(Although I did check to see what ipconfig does in Windows. Upper case!)
Bert
-
There is no way this is an erratum. There was a clear choice in the WG
to standardise on lower case.
There could be no objection to a presentation-layer choice to display upper
case in a GUI as a matter of user preference. However, I was surprised by
the suggestion that upper case is better for pe
Although the comments about "lazy" are specious, I support requiring uppercase
display simply from the viewpoint of easy recognition by those of us with
less-than-perfect visual acuity. There probably is no other strong reason
except apparent consistency of display which, in itself, is a good t
On 2010-12-02 22:17, RFC Errata System wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5952, "A
> Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation".
[..]
> Historically from the 1960's, hexidecimal digits other than decimal
> digits are represented by upper case letters. Lower
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5952,
"A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation".
--
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5952&eid=2656
--
Original Message
Subject: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-00.txt
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 05:00:01 -0800
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
Reply-To: internet-dra...@ietf.org
To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
CC: ipv6@ietf.org
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Using the IPv6 flow label for equal cost multipath
routing and link aggregation in tunnels
Author(s)
12 matches
Mail list logo
