[Fwd: Re: Informational RFC to be: ]

2011-03-21 Thread Brian E Carpenter
FYI - this was an Independent Submission to the RFc Editor. Brian Original Message Subject: Re: Informational RFC to be: Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:02:27 -0700 From: The IESG To: RFC Editor CC: i...@iana.org, The IESG , ietf-annou...@ietf.org The IESG has no problem with t

6MAN WG Last Call:

2011-03-21 Thread Bob Hinden
All, This message starts a 6MAN Working Group Last Call on advancing: Title : Rationale for update to the IPv6 flow label specification Author(s) : S. Amante, et al. Filename: draft-ietf-6man-flow-update-04.txt Pages : 12

Re: Why has RFC 4941 been designed in such a way, that it might causeaddress conflicts?

2011-03-21 Thread Timothy Winters
Hello, The UNH-IOL has made a white paper from the event available on the IPv6 homepage. As Hemant stated there were issues discovered around DAD and the need for it. Regards, Tim On Mar 20, 2011, at 7:09 PM, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Brian E C