RE: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming

2011-04-08 Thread Manfredi, Albert E
> -Original Message- > From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Richard Hartmann > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 8:10 PM > To: Scott Brim > Cc: 6man List > Subject: Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming > > On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 01:01, Scott Brim wr

Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming

2011-04-08 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 01:01, Scott Brim wrote: > If enough people express support we can make this a BCP That would be very welcome indeed. >,  but whatever is > done here, "the market" will decide on its own. . If this poll [1] and the various feedback by operators is a reliable metric, the

Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming

2011-04-08 Thread Scott Brim
If enough people express support we can make this a BCP, but whatever is done here, "the market" will decide on its own. . [Sent from my Vibrant.] IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https

Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming

2011-04-08 Thread james woodyatt
On Apr 8, 2011, at 4:00 AM, Tim Chown wrote: > > Maybe hextet will grow on me. I'll start using it and see what funny looks > or comments I get I would have preferred "hexquad" but nobody ever listens to me. -- james woodyatt member of technical staff, core os networking ---

Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming

2011-04-08 Thread Scott Schmit
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:05:15PM +1000, Karl Auer wrote: > On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 04:03 +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 03:54, Karl Auer wrote: > My argument against "hextet" is simple. It is not a legitimate > abbreviation of "hexadectet" for two reasons. Firstly, you c

Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming

2011-04-08 Thread Tim Chown
On 7 Apr 2011, at 21:07, Richard Hartmann wrote: > > Anyway, after a long time of gathering feedback, we have boiled down > the options to hextet and quibble. quibble remains in there mostly for > historic reasons and to gather additional feedback. I do not think > suggesting two separate terms i

Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming

2011-04-08 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:05, Karl Auer wrote: > OK. I've read it and find many of the arguments to be generally > unconvincing. Right with you on "chazwazza" though :-) That's fine. This is why we are here :) > If the draft is to document what amounts to a popularity contest for a > word, the

Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming

2011-04-08 Thread Karl Auer
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 04:03 +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 03:54, Karl Auer wrote: > If you look at -02 of the initial draft, you will find a full list. OK. I've read it and find many of the arguments to be generally unconvincing. Right with you on "chazwazza" though :-)