Re: Is it legal to set IID to 0?

Thanks Mark, I was not aware of that before. Thanks again, washam 2011/7/15 Mark Smith : > Hi, > > On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:01:30 +0800 > Washam Fan wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I don't know if it is legal when I manually set a unicast address with >> IID=0. Linux allows that and RFC4291 doesn't explicitl

Re: Is it legal to set IID to 0?

Hi, On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:01:30 +0800 Washam Fan wrote: > Hi, > > I don't know if it is legal when I manually set a unicast address with > IID=0. Linux allows that and RFC4291 doesn't explicitly prohibit that. > I assume it is legal, Right? > That's the subnet router anycast address, so you

Is it legal to set IID to 0?

Hi, I don't know if it is legal when I manually set a unicast address with IID=0. Linux allows that and RFC4291 doesn't explicitly prohibit that. I assume it is legal, Right? THanks in advance. washam IETF IPv6 working group mai

Re: /64 ND DoS

On Jul 13, 2011, at 9:51 AM, RJ Atkinson wrote: > On Weds 13 July 2011 at 11:54:08 -0400, Joel Halpern wrote: >> There appear to be several different cases, which can be addressed >> by different reasonable mechanisms (not firewalls, and not lengthening >> the subnet prefix.) >> >> For ISPs, I