On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Alexandru Petrescu <
alexandru.petre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Comments on draft draft-lynn-6man-6lobac-00:
>
> - needs a section on multicast address mapping; it may not be
> straightforward: it may need to _not_ send all ip-multicasted messages to
> 255 link-layer
On Jul 26, 2011, at 6:09 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> Le 27/07/2011 00:05, Joel Jaeggli a écrit :
>> If you're commenting on v6nd draft I don't think we have any intention of
>> connecting ~1.8 * 10^19 hosts to a subnet...
>
> Yes, commenting on the v6nd draft.
>
> Listening to the disxcuss
Le 27/07/2011 00:05, Joel Jaeggli a écrit :
If you're commenting on v6nd draft I don't think we have any intention of
connecting ~1.8 * 10^19 hosts to a subnet...
Yes, commenting on the v6nd draft.
Listening to the disxcussion it so sounde to me that these were ND
optimizations such as to su
If you're commenting on v6nd draft I don't think we have any intention of
connecting ~1.8 * 10^19 hosts to a subnet...
On Jul 26, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> 2^64 is 10s of trillions (not just trillions) and only for anglo-saxons.
>
> 2^64 is exabytes of memory (not giga, nor
Comments on draft draft-lynn-6man-6lobac-00:
- needs a section on multicast address mapping; it may not be
straightforward: it may need to _not_ send all ip-multicasted messages
to 255 link-layer address: the solicited-node multicast address includes
the octet address (as opposed to eg ethern
I mentioned this draft on the mike line today:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arkko-core-sleepy-sensors
Implementing Tiny COAP Sensors
The authors are developing COAP and IPv6-based sensor networks for
environments where lightweight implementations, long battery
lifetimes, and minimal
2^64 is 10s of trillions (not just trillions) and only for anglo-saxons.
2^64 is exabytes of memory (not giga, nor tera, nor peta).
I am not sure you look at adapting nd for these figures.
Alex
IETF IPv6 working group mailing
And the corresponding distributing protocol format was already there in the
previous version. :)
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt-00
We just dropped this bit in the latest -01 version.
Best regards,
On 2011/07/27, at 5:37, Arifumi Matsumoto wrote:
> All,
>
> let me
All,
let me re-post the candidate extended policy table format below.
> For example, if we extend the policy table to have Privacy column like below,
>
> PrefixPrecedence Label Privacy
> ::1/128 60 0 OFF
> fc00::/7 50 1
We still need volunteers for a meeting taker and jabber scribe.
Bob & Brian
On Jul 24, 2011, at 1:03 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The 6man chairs are looking for volunteers to take minutes and for jabber
> scribes. If you are interested please let the chairs know. It's your
> opportunity
Le 25 juil. 2011 à 20:50, Dan Wing a écrit :
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rémi Després [mailto:despres.r...@laposte.net]
>> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 1:43 PM
>> To: Dan Wing
>> Cc: 'james woodyatt'; 'RJ Atkinson'; ipv6@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: PMTUD and MTU < 1280
>>
>> Dan,
>>
>> 1
11 matches
Mail list logo