Re: comments on ipv6-over-mstp

2011-07-26 Thread Kerry Lynn
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Alexandru Petrescu < alexandru.petre...@gmail.com> wrote: > Comments on draft draft-lynn-6man-6lobac-00: > > - needs a section on multicast address mapping; it may not be > straightforward: it may need to _not_ send all ip-multicasted messages to > 255 link-layer

Re: 2^64 is 10s of trillions (not just trillions)

2011-07-26 Thread Joel Jaeggli
On Jul 26, 2011, at 6:09 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote: > Le 27/07/2011 00:05, Joel Jaeggli a écrit : >> If you're commenting on v6nd draft I don't think we have any intention of >> connecting ~1.8 * 10^19 hosts to a subnet... > > Yes, commenting on the v6nd draft. > > Listening to the disxcuss

Re: 2^64 is 10s of trillions (not just trillions)

2011-07-26 Thread Alexandru Petrescu
Le 27/07/2011 00:05, Joel Jaeggli a écrit : If you're commenting on v6nd draft I don't think we have any intention of connecting ~1.8 * 10^19 hosts to a subnet... Yes, commenting on the v6nd draft. Listening to the disxcussion it so sounde to me that these were ND optimizations such as to su

Re: 2^64 is 10s of trillions (not just trillions)

2011-07-26 Thread Joel Jaeggli
If you're commenting on v6nd draft I don't think we have any intention of connecting ~1.8 * 10^19 hosts to a subnet... On Jul 26, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote: > 2^64 is 10s of trillions (not just trillions) and only for anglo-saxons. > > 2^64 is exabytes of memory (not giga, nor

comments on ipv6-over-mstp

2011-07-26 Thread Alexandru Petrescu
Comments on draft draft-lynn-6man-6lobac-00: - needs a section on multicast address mapping; it may not be straightforward: it may need to _not_ send all ip-multicasted messages to 255 link-layer address: the solicited-node multicast address includes the octet address (as opposed to eg ethern

pointer to the core draft

2011-07-26 Thread Jari Arkko
I mentioned this draft on the mike line today: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arkko-core-sleepy-sensors Implementing Tiny COAP Sensors The authors are developing COAP and IPv6-based sensor networks for environments where lightweight implementations, long battery lifetimes, and minimal

2^64 is 10s of trillions (not just trillions)

2011-07-26 Thread Alexandru Petrescu
2^64 is 10s of trillions (not just trillions) and only for anglo-saxons. 2^64 is exabytes of memory (not giga, nor tera, nor peta). I am not sure you look at adapting nd for these figures. Alex IETF IPv6 working group mailing

Re: Privacy Bit in the policy table Re: rfc3484-bis issue 2: privacy addresses

2011-07-26 Thread Arifumi Matsumoto
And the corresponding distributing protocol format was already there in the previous version. :) http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt-00 We just dropped this bit in the latest -01 version. Best regards, On 2011/07/27, at 5:37, Arifumi Matsumoto wrote: > All, > > let me

Privacy Bit in the policy table Re: rfc3484-bis issue 2: privacy addresses

2011-07-26 Thread Arifumi Matsumoto
All, let me re-post the candidate extended policy table format below. > For example, if we extend the policy table to have Privacy column like below, > > PrefixPrecedence Label Privacy > ::1/128 60 0 OFF > fc00::/7 50 1

Re: Need Jabber Scribe and Minute taker for 6man session

2011-07-26 Thread Bob Hinden
We still need volunteers for a meeting taker and jabber scribe. Bob & Brian On Jul 24, 2011, at 1:03 PM, Bob Hinden wrote: > Hi, > > The 6man chairs are looking for volunteers to take minutes and for jabber > scribes. If you are interested please let the chairs know. It's your > opportunity

Re: PMTUD and MTU < 1280

2011-07-26 Thread Rémi Després
Le 25 juil. 2011 à 20:50, Dan Wing a écrit : >> -Original Message- >> From: Rémi Després [mailto:despres.r...@laposte.net] >> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 1:43 PM >> To: Dan Wing >> Cc: 'james woodyatt'; 'RJ Atkinson'; ipv6@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: PMTUD and MTU < 1280 >> >> Dan, >> >> 1