Jonathan,
Please see below. I think we are converging. The main remaining discussion item
below is the description of what the border router does.
> Here are my comments in more detail:
>
>> Datagrams being forwarded within a RPL domain MUST include a RPL
>> Option. For datagrams sourced with
Jonathan,
Please see inline. If you agree with what I'm writing here you should just
submit a new draft version and we can take it from there. But it might be that
on some aspects we need further discussion.
links within a RPL domain SHOULD have
a MTU of at least 1280 + 40 (outer IP header) +
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Rationale for update to the IPv6 flow label specification'
(draft-ietf-6man-flow-update-07.txt) as an Informational RFC
This document is the product of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Jari Arkko and Ralph Droms.
