Joel,
Your draft mentions that the router that just rebooted would send 0-sourced
solicitations to all the hosts that it knows about. What do you have in mind,
exactly? If the router rebooted, it does not know anything, right? Do you mean
to say, "each time it sees an incoming packet from a yet
I support adoption of this draft as a 6MAN WG document.
-K-
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Brian Haberman wrote:
> All,
> This is a consensus call on adopting:
>
> Title : RFC3627 to Historic status
> Author(s) : Wesley George
> Filename : draft-george-6man-3627-historic-
The purpose of the various exchange and triggering mechanism I describe
in the last section are to enable the approach to be used before one has
upgraded all the hosts on the subnet. With the RS retransmission to
enable reliable discovery by the router, the rest probably become
harmless but un
Sorry meant to actually reply.
I'm curious, essentially what the implications are for interaction
between an existing implimentation in a host, and an nd implimentation
which no longer does discovery.
On 10/24/11 06:21 , Joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 10/21/11 07:44 , Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>> I would
On 10/21/11 07:44 , Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> I would like to call people's attention to the draft below.
> I would like to hear from folks as to what they think of this complement
> to some of the existing work on the ND based denial of service attack.
> I do not intend to present this at the WG me
I think this is an interesting approach and encourage the w.g. to read it and
comment on the list.
Bob
On Oct 21, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> I would like to call people's attention to the draft below.
> I would like to hear from folks as to what they think of this complement to
