Bob and Brian,
Please give us a slot for Taipei to present the following document.
Topic: Enhanced DAD (solving the reflected DAD and some other DAD
related problems)
Presenter: Hemant/Rajiv/Wes George
Time requested: 5-10 minutes
Draft name: draft-hsingh-6man-enhanced-dad-02 to 6man.
Thanks,
H
This is precisely the question that I and Bernie Volz asked a year or
two back. Similarly when it was discussed to add a DNS option to the
IPv6 ND RA when the DNS option was already supported by DHCPv6. The
question was if the receiving node gets the same information from two
different sources, w
What happens when both RA and DHCPv6 are configured?
- Wes
On 10/28/11 9:11 AM, "Brian Haberman" wrote:
> All,
> The MIF WG is currently defining a DHCPv6 option for defining
> routes (including default routes) on client nodes. Please review the
> draft and provide any feedback you have.
All,
The MIF WG is currently defining a DHCPv6 option for defining
routes (including default routes) on client nodes. Please review the
draft and provide any feedback you have.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-03
Regards,
Brian
--
