All,
This message starts a two week 6MAN Working Group last call on advancing:
Title : Duplicate Address Detection Proxy
Author(s) : Fabio Costa
Xavier Pougnard
Hongyu Li
Jean-Michel Comb
Hi, Ole,
On 04/26/2012 08:50 AM, Ole Trøan wrote:
>> I think that draft-gont-6man-predictable-fragment-id is also ready
>> for wg call for adoption as wg document -- I've rev'ed the
>> document since IETF 83 in response to the feedback received during
>> my presentation (i.e., just require the Fr
Pavel,
I concur with your description of the problem.
do you have a proposal for how it can be solved?
Best regards,
Ole
On Apr 19, 2012, at 23:32 , Pavel Šimerda wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm starting my work on linux NetworkManager. I've been following
> several bugreports during the recent month
Fernando,
[...]
> Some errata for the minutes:
>
> The current text says:
> cut here
> Ole asked about how this was different from an unknown L4 header?
>
>
> cut here
>
> There was an answer, so "" should probably be replaced with
> something along the lines of "Fernando
Hi,
We have seen this same problem as well.
Does anyone have any idea why the lifetime is bound with SHOULD to this
very short time period? For example, if the Lifetime == MaxRtrAdvInterval,
a host often would effectively be forced to send RS to refresh the RDNSS
information before RDNSS expirati
