On 2012-05-11 21:16, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> i beg to differ. i have used the restrictive clause for years exactly
>>> as fernando states. if the wg does not adopt, then i may take *my*
>>> marbles and go home.
>> Thanks for saying it so clearly. I choose to not do that as do many
>> others. I al
>> i beg to differ. i have used the restrictive clause for years exactly
>> as fernando states. if the wg does not adopt, then i may take *my*
>> marbles and go home.
> Thanks for saying it so clearly. I choose to not do that as do many
> others. I allow my contributions to be used by others in
Randy,
>>>
>> It is allowed and I don't want to start a big IPR thread here, but I
>> think the intent for this clause (no derivative works) is for work
>> that someone wants to present to a w.g. that was not intended to be an
>> IETF work item. My opinion is that it's not appropriate for docume
Dear Brian,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Brian Haberman [mailto:br...@innovationslab.net]
>Envoyé : jeudi 10 mai 2012 20:03
>À : Lee, Yiu
>Cc : Carsten Bormann; BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP;
>mbo...@ietf.org; 6...@ietf.org; The IESG;
>apps-disc...@ietf.
Tina
> -Original Message-
> From: mboned-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:mboned-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Brian Haberman
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 11:03 AM
> To: Lee, Yiu
> Cc: 6...@ietf.org; apps-disc...@ietf.org application-layer protocols;
> draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addres
Original Message -
From: "Juergen Schoenwaelder"
To: "Brian E Carpenter" ; "Benoit Claise"
Cc: "t.petch" ; "6man"
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 9:43 AM
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 07:56:43AM +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > On 2012-05-10 11:39, t.petch wrote:
> > > Original Message -
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 07:56:43AM +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 2012-05-10 11:39, t.petch wrote:
> > Original Message -
> > From: "Juergen Schoenwaelder"
> > To: "Brian E Carpenter"
> > Cc: "6man"
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 7:34 PM
> >> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 03:33:07PM +
