All,
Based on the feedback received, the 6man chairs believe there is consensus to
adopt draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02 as a 6MAN working group
document.
The authors should submit the next revision as an 6MAN document.
Regards,
Bob Hinden and Ole Troan
On Jun 13, 2012, at 5:29 A
All,
Based on the feedback received, the 6man chairs believe there is consensus to
adopt draft-gont-6man-nd-extension-headers-03 as a 6MAN working group document.
The author should submit the next revision as an 6MAN document.
Regards,
Bob Hinden and Ole Troan
On Jun 13, 2012, at 5:32 AM, O
+1
-Vishwas
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Dominik Elsbroek <
dominik.elsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also stongly support to adopt this draft as a WG-document.
>
> Cheers,
> Dominik Elsbroek
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Dave Hart wrote:
> > I am in favor of adopting draft-gont-6ma
Hi Chairs,
On 06/13/2012 08:32 AM, Ole Trøan wrote:
> All,
> This starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting
>
> Title : Security Implications of the Use of IPv6 Extension Headers
> with IPv6
> Neighbor Discovery
> Author(s) : F. Gont
> Filename : draft-
On 06/27/2012 10:34 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
>
> I read through the draft and I am generally supportive of the sentiment
> behind the draft. But the draft itself is not at all clear on what
> constitutes a "entire IPv6 header chain". Without this, I think the
> draft in its current form is not a
