Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draft-smith-6man-mitigate-nd-cache-dos-slnd-01.txt

2012-10-12 Thread Karl Auer
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 17:57 -0700, Mark ZZZ Smith wrote: > Here's a new version of my stateless neighbor discovery draft. Changes: This para seems a little harder to understand than it should be: "A default route should never be used to define a trusted packet source prefix. If a router's

Fw: New Version Notification for draft-smith-6man-mitigate-nd-cache-dos-slnd-01.txt

2012-10-12 Thread Mark ZZZ Smith
Hi, Here's a new version of my stateless neighbor discovery draft. Changes: - make it more obvious that hosts don't need to be changed - more informative introduction/problem definition text - allow low end/embedded platforms to consider all traffic sources untrusted if a DoS attack is occurring

Re: draft-chakrabarti-nordmark-6man-efficient-nd-00.txt

2012-10-12 Thread Mark ZZZ Smith
Hi, - Original Message - > From: Carsten Bormann > To: Samita Chakrabarti > Cc: 6man Mailing List > Sent: Friday, 12 October 2012 5:23 PM > Subject: Re: draft-chakrabarti-nordmark-6man-efficient-nd-00.txt > >T wo quick comments: >   > Clearly, mitigating the external ND table DoS is

Re: draft-boucadair-6man-sip-proxy-01

2012-10-12 Thread Mark ZZZ Smith
Hi, I agree with Ray, I think this is fundamentally just re-inventing the wheel. I notice that one of the justifications for this is that "DHCPv6 is not required in all 3GPP releases." Why isn't it? Based on this statement, it seems to me that the 3GPP architecture doesn't recognise that there

Re: draft-boucadair-6man-sip-proxy-01

2012-10-12 Thread RJ Atkinson
I agree with Ray Hunter's analysis of this proposal, as posted on the IPv6 list (available at the URL above). Ran IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.

6MAN WG Last Call:

2012-10-12 Thread RJ Atkinson
I support publishing this as an IETF Standards-Track RFC. I have no objection to the clarifying edits proposed by Ray Hunter in his IPv6 list note of 10 Oct 2012 at 12:00:33 +0200. Ran IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv

6MAN WG Last Call:

2012-10-12 Thread RJ Atkinson
I support publishing this on the IETF Standards Track. Ran IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6

Ronald Bonica's Yes on draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-04

2012-10-12 Thread Ronald Bonica
Ronald Bonica has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-04: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to http://

Ronald Bonica's Yes on draft-ietf-6man-udpzero-06: (with COMMENT)

2012-10-12 Thread Ronald Bonica
Ronald Bonica has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-6man-udpzero-06: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to http://www.i

RE: Ronald Bonica's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-udpzero-06: (with DISCUSS)

2012-10-12 Thread Ronald Bonica
Magnus, Thanks! I will downgrade my DISCUSS to a comment and trust you to make that change. Ron > -Original Message- > From: Magnus Westerlund [mailto:magnus.westerl...@ericsson.com] > Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 5:24 AM > To: Ronald

Re: Ronald Bonica's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-udpzero-06: (with DISCUSS)

2012-10-12 Thread Magnus Westerlund
Hi, Only having thought about this shortly, I think this is reasonable to add. I might have another opinion when we actually start writing it. But in that case I will come back and tell why I have another opinion. Cheers Magnus On 2012-10-11 04:05, Ronald Bonica wrote: > Magnus, > > I think th

Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-udpzero-06: (with COMMENT)

2012-10-12 Thread Magnus Westerlund
On 2012-10-10 12:51, Stewart Bryant wrote: > > What is an implementation? The application running over the tunnel? You > refer to "An encapsulating protocol" in the sentence before the bullet > points, is this what you mean? > >> For a tunnel protocol it is the tunnel protocol implementation that

RE: draft-boucadair-6man-sip-proxy-01

2012-10-12 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Dear Ray, Thank you for the comments. Please see inline. Cheers, Med >-Message d'origine- >De : Ray Hunter [mailto:v6...@globis.net] >Envoyé : vendredi 5 octobre 2012 21:45 >À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/OLN >Cc : 6...@ietf.org >Objet : Re: draft-boucadair-6man-sip-proxy-01 > >I have r