Re: draft-kaiser-nd-pd-00.txt

2012-11-03 Thread Andrew McGregor
On 3/11/2012, at 2:29 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote: > > (I am not sure this prohibition of advertising an expired prefix is > specified or coded, I just suppose it as natural). > > Alex > It is specified, unfortunately current implementations often fail to behave as specified. There is a

Re: draft-kaiser-nd-pd-00.txt

2012-11-03 Thread Alexandru Petrescu
Le 03/11/2012 19:05, Romain KUNTZ a écrit : Hello Alex, On Nov 3, 2012, at 17:53 , Alexandru Petrescu wrote: Le 02/11/2012 20:59, Michael Richardson a écrit : Alexandru Petrescu wrote: AP> Well yes, the prefix allocated to a vehicle when using NEMO is AP> actually DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation R

Re: draft-kaiser-nd-pd-00.txt

2012-11-03 Thread Alexandru Petrescu
Le 03/11/2012 18:54, Romain KUNTZ a écrit : Hello Alex, On Nov 3, 2012, at 17:41 , Alexandru Petrescu wrote: Le 25/10/2012 15:52, Michael Richardson a écrit : ralph> Why wouldn't RPL be used for such networks? It has built-in PD for ralph> dynamic networks, if I understand it correctly, wit

Re: draft-kaiser-nd-pd-00.txt

2012-11-03 Thread Romain KUNTZ
Hello Alex, On Nov 3, 2012, at 17:53 , Alexandru Petrescu wrote: > Le 02/11/2012 20:59, Michael Richardson a écrit : >> >> Alexandru Petrescu wrote: AP> Well >> yes, the prefix allocated to a vehicle when using NEMO is AP> >> actually DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation RFC6276. In that RFC the AP> >> p

Re: draft-kaiser-nd-pd-00.txt

2012-11-03 Thread Romain KUNTZ
Hello Alex, On Nov 3, 2012, at 17:41 , Alexandru Petrescu wrote: > Le 25/10/2012 15:52, Michael Richardson a écrit : >> >> ralph> Why wouldn't RPL be used for such networks? It has built-in >> PD for ralph> dynamic networks, if I understand it correctly, with >> RA used at the ralph> subnet le

Re: draft-kaiser-nd-pd-00.txt

2012-11-03 Thread Alexandru Petrescu
Le 02/11/2012 20:59, Michael Richardson a écrit : Alexandru Petrescu wrote: AP> Well yes, the prefix allocated to a vehicle when using NEMO is AP> actually DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation RFC6276. In that RFC the AP> presence of HA is mandatory. AP> But some times HA may not be available, e.g. in re

Re: draft-kaiser-nd-pd-00.txt

2012-11-03 Thread Alexandru Petrescu
Le 25/10/2012 15:52, Michael Richardson a écrit : ralph> Why wouldn't RPL be used for such networks? It has built-in PD for ralph> dynamic networks, if I understand it correctly, with RA used at the ralph> subnet level. Alexandru Petrescu wrote: AP> RA used to exchange routes - if this is what