Hello All:
As a follow-up from the IETF85 6man meeting presentation on Efficient-nd draft,
we
have posted a new version of the document which incorporated comments from
Carsten Bormann in the list on editorial changes and some more clarification
and editorial changes based on individual commen
Op 21 nov. 2012, om 16:28 heeft George, Wes het volgende geschreven:
>> From: renum-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:renum-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
>> Of Teco Boot
>>
>>
>> Op 20 nov. 2012, om 18:24 heeft Stig Venaas het volgende geschreven:
>>
IP-Specific configuration
>>
>> What about "IP c
Sounds like we're talking about templates.
On 21/11/2012 10:28 AM, George, Wes wrote:
From: renum-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:renum-boun...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Teco Boot
Op 20 nov. 2012, om 18:24 heeft Stig Venaas het volgende
geschreven:
IP-Specific configuration
What about "IP configurat
> From: renum-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:renum-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Teco Boot
>
>
> Op 20 nov. 2012, om 18:24 heeft Stig Venaas het volgende geschreven:
>
> >> IP-Specific configuration
>
> What about "IP configuration for dynamic IP addresses"?
>
[WEG] I'm not keen on that nomenclature
> > You can probably get a *hint* about my location from an IP lookup. You can
> > definitely not be certain my location
>
> Well, with the new draft, you can do the same, location accuracy can be
> tweaked to reflect city only, or city and region..etc.
And what makes you think I'm interested in
Op 20 nov. 2012, om 18:24 heeft Stig Venaas het volgende geschreven:
>> IP-Specific configuration
What about "IP configuration for dynamic IP addresses"?
Teco
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative R
> One last point, is that your current IP address reflects your location, I
> can simply do ip lookup and find out your location. Would that be also
> considered as privacy breach?
You can probably get a *hint* about my location from an IP lookup. You
can definitely not be certain my location - si
> Ammar Salih writes:
>> There are LOTS of ISPs between the client and the destination. Most
>> of these can get nothing about your location.
> They can get much more! trust me, the point is that if you don't
> trust the ISP then you should be worried about all your un-encrypted
> tra
Mark,
> There are LOTS of ISPs between the client and the destination. Most of
> these can get nothing about your location.
They can get much more! trust me, the point is that if you don't trust the
ISP then you should be worried about all your un-encrypted traffic, not only
location.
Anythin
