Hi, Tassos,
On 01/20/2013 07:15 AM, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
>> On 01/19/2013 07:49 PM, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
>>> First of all, i would like to see a reference to cases where the prefix
>>> doesn't change too often (since this is recommended by many people for
>>> various deployment
Dear all,
I have considered your comments and updated our draft rfc accordingly. Feel
free to add further comments.
Thank you,
Hosnieh
Filename:draft-rafiee-6man-ssas
Revision:01
Title: A Simple Secure Addressing Generation Scheme for IPv6
AutoConfiguration (SSAS)
C
Hi, Bob,
The discussion on whether the proposed 4rd IID range is "compatible with the
IPv6 addressing architecture" has apparently come to a standstill.
Yet an answer of 6man to Softwire is expected.
A. To help making a WG decision, here are key points that, in my understanding,
emerged from th
Magnus and I updated the draft below to align this revision to the work
on the related RFC 2460 update.
Note of apology - I submitted an interim (rev-09) over the weekend with
an unintended merging of bullets 5,6,7 in section 5. This revision -10
corrects this, by reapplying my edits to rev -0
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Applicability Statement for the use of IPv6 UDP
Datagrams with Zero Checksums
Author(s) : Godred F
