Hi Jari,
I reflected your comments with 03-version I-D that will be submitted
if you are satisfied with the changes:
- 03-version I-D:
http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~jjeong/publications/ietf-internet-draft/draft-ietf-6man-dns-options-bis-03.txt
- Difference between 02-version I-D and 03-version I-D:
Hi Jari,
I will reflect your good comments on the next revision.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Paul
--
===
Paul (Jaehoon) Jeong
Software Engineer, Ph.D
Brocade
6000 Nathan Ln N, Plymouth, MN 55442
Mobile: +1.651.587.7774
Email: jaehoon.p...@gmail.com
URI: http://www.cs.umn.edu/~jj
Hi IPv6 WG folks,
Let me announce a new RFC on IPv6 Router Advertisement Option for DNS
Configuration (i.e., RDNSS Option).
Our authors hope that this new option will be useful in IPv6 networks.
I thank the contributors in Acknowledgement section and other people in our
IPv6 WG
for their g
decide
RA approach as another standard for
IPv6 Host DNS configuration.
In this meeting, it seems more suitable to discuss only on
draft-ietf-dnsop-ipv6-dns-configuration-02.txt.
Thanks.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Ralph Droms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jaehoon Pau
ted:
draft-ietf-dnsop-ipv6-dns-configuration-02.txt
These drafts will be announced by IETF soon.
I think that they can be used as base documents for our discussion.
Paul
--
Jaehoon Paul Jeong (Research Engineer)
TEL. +82-42-860-1664
Mobile +82-16-
Thanks for your good comments.
I agree with you at your two points.
Especially, number 2 is the opinion of your co-author, Suresh.
He will speak about your opinion.
Paul
>- Original Message -
>From: "Christian Huitema" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Jaehoon
- Original Message -
From: "Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "IPv6 DNS Configuration" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 2:38 PM
Subject: Re: IPv6 Host Configuration of Recursive DNS Server
> There is
First of all, thanks for your interest.
Recently, DNSOP working group decided to write an Information RFC
describing "IPv6 Host Configuration of DNS Server Information Approaches";
a) RA option, b) DHCPv6 option, and c) Well-known anycast addresses.
After this RFC is published, I hope that our RA
