, 2007 10:59 PM
To: Leino, Tammy
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: RFC 3484 Question
At Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:40:24 -0600,
"Leino, Tammy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ::/0 is going to cover all addresses that aren't covered explicitly
> by some other prefix in the Defaul
d return a label of 4?
Thanks,
Tammy
-Original Message-----
From: Leino, Tammy
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 3:40 PM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: RE: RFC 3484 Question
Hello All,
I think I see my error.
::/0 is going to cover all addresses that aren't covered explicitly by some
Hello All,
I think I see my error.
::/0 is going to cover all addresses that aren't covered explicitly by some
other prefix in the Default Policy Table, right?
Thanks,
Tammy
-Original Message-
From: Leino, Tammy
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 3:36 PM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject
Hello All,
I have a question regarding two examples in section 10.2 of RFC 3484 for
default destination address selection.
The Default Policy Table is defined as:
PrefixPrecedence Label
::1/128 50 0
::/0 40 1
2002::/1
I had this same discussion with the DHCP working group a few weeks back.
The end result was that there should always be an IPv6 router on-link
configured to transmit RAs. They could not fathom why an IPv6 network
would not have an IPv6 router on-link. That is why there is
intentionally no DHCPv6
I agree with all your remarks Iljitsch, and I believe my customers feel
the same way as you.
-Original Message-
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 5:56 AM
To: Bernie Volz ((volz))
Cc: Leino, Tammy; ipv6@ietf.org; John Jason Brzozowski
time and advice.
Best Regards,
Tammy
-Original Message-
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 6:18 AM
To: Leino, Tammy
Cc: John Jason Brzozowski (JJMB); Hemant Singh (shemant); ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: prefix length determination for DHCPv6
option and default router option would be useful.
Best Regards,
Tammy
-Original Message-
From: Bernie Volz (volz) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 7:39 PM
To: Leino, Tammy; Iljitsch van Beijnum
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; John Jason Brzozowski (JJMB); [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
o RAs on link.
If there is DHCPv6 but no RA, who tells me my prefix length?
Best Regards,
Tammy
-Original Message-
From: Bernie Volz (volz) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 7:20 PM
To: Leino, Tammy; Iljitsch van Beijnum
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; John Jason Brzozowski
prefix length
either for an IA_NA or just a single IA_ADDR. In the meantime, I will
take your advice.
Best Regards,
Tammy
-Original Message-
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 6:52 PM
To: Leino, Tammy
Cc: John Jason Brzozowski (JJMB); He
Thank you Hemant. I appreciate your comments.
-Original Message-
From: Hemant Singh (shemant) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 6:14 PM
To: Leino, Tammy; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: RE: prefix length determination for DHCPv6
_
From: Leino, Tammy [mailto
: John Jason Brzozowski (JJMB) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 6:20 PM
To: Hemant Singh (shemant); Leino, Tammy; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: RE: prefix length determination for DHCPv6
Hello Hemant,
There is no DHCPv6 mechabism to explicitly transmit router/gateway information
Hello,
In implementing RFC 3315, I see no option or field in the IA_NA option for a
prefix length associated with an assigned IPv6 address. How does the client
determine the prefix length of the IPv6 address the server is assigning?
Furthermore, in the absence of a configured IPv6 router on th
13 matches
Mail list logo
