On 29 Jun 2007, at 7:36pm, Scott Leibrand wrote:
[...]
The RIRs currently require small networks to get provider
aggregatable (PA) space from their provider(s).
This just isn't true. Both APNIC and the RIPE NCC will assign
prefixes longer than an IPv4 /24. APNIC even document the fact quit
o you think ISPs will try and force renumber (or re-prefixing)
costs on their existing customers?
Regards,
--
Leo Vegoda
IANA Numbers Liaison
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
there - or will there be -
for those organisations to return their prefixes and take PA space
from one or more of their upstream providers? Presumably that
incentive is what will keep ULA-C prefixes within a single site.
Regards,
--
Leo Vegoda
IANA Numbers Li
f you qualified for PI space you wouldn't want ULA-C
space. Is that right?
--
Leo Vegoda
IANA Numbers Liaison
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
will be an address clash?
Regards,
Leo Vegoda
IANA Numbers Liaison
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
r many networks.
I wouldn't be surprised if some folks saw the lack of an external
root for regular ULAs as an advantage. And while I appreciate that
routing table growth is expensive, should we be encouraging people to
NAT the interfaces on their internal routing infrastructure?
Reg
C a screwdriver?
Regards,
--
Leo Vegoda
IANA Numbers Liaison
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
e of
ULA-C is that it solves the same problem that ARIN's IPv6 PI policy
solves but better. In effect, developing ULA-C helps side-step ARIN's
policy development process?
Regards,
--
Leo Vegoda
IANA Numbers Liaison
---
ignments or does it solve a new problem?
Regards,
--
Leo Vegoda
IANA Numbers Liaison
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
