want to investigate this.
Thank you,
Hosnieh
-Original Message-
From: Fernando Gont [mailto:ferna...@gont.com.ar]
Sent: Donnerstag, 20. Dezember 2012 22:29
To: Rafiee, Hosnieh
Cc: Fernando Gont (fg...@si6networks.com); Bob Hinden (bob.hin...@gmail.com);
ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Chairs
Correction to prior comment
Ole and Bob: I do think that the extension to the Privacy Extension RFC is
applicable here.
...
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/
Ole and Bob: I don't think that the extension to the Privacy Extension RFC is
applicable here.
Fernando:
I think some of these comments were also made by Ole and Bob but, as I was so
busy, I could not finish them and send them.
Now the question is whether or not you are using the "lifetime" fo
Thank you for your response, please find my reply below
-Original Message-
From: Fernando Gont [mailto:fg...@si6networks.com]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 5:32 PM
To: Rafiee, Hosnieh
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; bob.hin...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: FW: 6MAN WG Last Call:
Hi, Hosnieh,
Thanks so
Follow-up
To clarify my question from my last email, I raise three important issues here:
1 - The assumption made in this draft is not true because, according to RFC
4941, the IID is randomly generated and so will never be the same value (The
use of stable storage in the first approach and the
Hello,
I have one question regarding this draft
What is the main difference of your approach with RFC 3972 and 4941?
As explained in section 3 of this draft, F() is a cryptography algorithm. In
both ,privacy extension and RFC 3972 (if sec value is 0), discussed almost the
same approach as you des
More ideas and comments would be greatly apprecitated as I want to upload a new
version of my draft RFC in which I will incorporate applicable comments.
-Original Message-
From: Rafiee, Hosnieh
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 9:28 AM
To: 'Mark Andrews'
Cc: dns...@ietf.org
S
Please take a look at my RFC draft and share your comments with me so that I
might improve it. I would like discuss this draft in IETF meetings in Atlanta.
Thanks,
Hosnieh
A new version of I-D, draft-rafiee-cga-tsig-00.txt has been successfully
submitted by Hosnieh Rafiee and posted to th
