On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 01:43:19PM -0700, Bob Hinden wrote:
> We would like to get your comments on the following two choices:
>
> 1) Deprecate RH0 as specified in .
I don't agree with all the details of this draft (particularly the
language around firewall policy), but I believe deprecation to be
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 05:09:34PM -0500, Tim Enos wrote:
> In section 4.2, IMO it would seem good to see a brief justification of
> the statement: "filtering based on the presence of any
>Routing Headers on IPv6 routers, regardless of type, is strongly
>discouraged."
In this sentence, is
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 03:54:48PM -0700, Dow Street wrote:
> I think the new draft is too extreme in its mitigation approach, and
> would favor the "disable by default" option instead.
I think the new draft is too soft in it's mitigation approach, and would
favour language that more strongly enco
